Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a class of timepieces that's normally used for even ten per cent of its potential.
What good is it to get the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has secured his wrist to the maximum following a dip and a few strokes, return immediately to couch under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use, it is merely the fault of old habits at least as much as the introduction of the so-called divers of this modern age that dates back into the middle of the previous century.
The incorrigible need to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the group can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -film additionally winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I believe that non-fans will remember well one of the first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist became a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other with no crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everybody.
These are just two of the very first cases that show how - fiction or fact - for over fifty years the press - driven by the watch industry - decided the diver watches should be the first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Maybe it is also from this day the brands in regards to describing their versions began to use the term: "appropriate for any occasion".
The 007 change, sadly also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most well-known spy in the world, and clearly also the opinion whose role has been played with the Omega Seamaster for many years.
But beyond their real use within this large family whose origins would simply have to deal with "hard greater than steel", today there are also models so bejeweled to dread even when you have to wash the palms.
But a true diver's view has normally always had a lot to say technically speaking. Let us just mention the features and constructive philosophies of those references.
I have a long-standing friend who's an expert diver and who, throughout his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to guarantee the following performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dive
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the operation of the device that reports that the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its motion, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches must adhere to specific rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, that which we know is the greatest, the best sub could be ultimately a watchable to provide features much milder and easier to handle.
I recall that in order to only immerse the surface in maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but this is not so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to avoid diving, especially if ours couldn't even rely to a screw-on crown, better still if secure on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the waterproof status of this submerged timepieces?
Precisely for those who would use them for specialist purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals on the dial in case the crown isn't completely screwed, as well as the watch is consequently in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the primary reason why even an abyssal super dive watch may need to be rushed to a service center, before seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, but on hardly any versions, which honestly I do not understand why.
You may have worn your diving diver's watch in your wrist to visit the sea and as a result, after adjusting the time, have left to twist the crown snugly. It's the most frequent case.
TIP - When you've worn the costume pick on the fly : either leave your diver somewhere read more safe or obligatorily create a closing but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a little 'of issues linked to the time that must meet the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've divided them into two categories. The order in which they appear doesn't signify any position.